Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Washington

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield

Ridgefield, WA · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield runs at 333% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield: 7.0 TCR = 333% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield safety composite

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.8

2020→2021

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield injury rate improved

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield's TCR fell 10.8 from 12.4 in 2020 to 1.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=12.4 · 2021=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Ridgefield, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 333% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/37
  • PHOTO Southern Field Welding
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southern Field Welding (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield averages 7.0 TCR (333% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield TCR series: 2020=12.4 · 2021=1.6 · BLS 2.1

Where Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 37 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Washington.

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield (69 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield
Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield (69 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Pacific Power Group - Perkins Ridgefield has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 12.4 12.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · WA · Ridgefield

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 45 employers in Ridgefield, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southern Field Welding 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NMC Group Gering 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Busch, SVG Austin 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alta Equipment Company Traverse City 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NBI 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE O'Brien Orchards, Inc. 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flanagan and Jones, LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE GenCap Construction Corp. 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR ilani resort casino 1,058 FTE
CITY-NEAR 53-046456260-3 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC7 DC7 RIDGEFIELD WA 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR VMS Ridgefield 324 FTE
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Springfield, IL 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MidMichigan Medical Center-Gratiot 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 381649-Cle-Beachwood Br 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CHI Overhead Doors, Arthur 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sun Pacific Harvesting | Citrus Harvesting 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vox Printing L.L.C. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE MFP Automation Engineering 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE TransPak, Inc. - Lincoln 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.