Fencing equipment (sporting goods) manufacturing · Oregon

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc.

Milton Freewater, OR · ~39 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. runs at 248% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fencing equipment (sporting goods) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc.: 8.2 TCR = 248% of Fencing equipment (sporting goods) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. safety composite

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc.: 0.0 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 15.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2024

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc.'s TCR rose 9.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 9.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339920 · Milton Freewater, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 248% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Resilite Sports Prod…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Resilite Sports Products, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. averages 8.2 TCR (248% of the Fencing equipment (sporting goods) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=5 · 2020=13.2 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=9.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. falls in its industry

197 Fencing equipment (sporting go establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Fencing equipment (sporting go employers in Oregon.

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Noble Panels & Gates, Inc.
Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Noble Panels & Gates, Inc. has fewer employees than the Fencing equipment (sporting goods) manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.5 6.3 3 0 0
2023 6.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 15.2 12.2 4 1 0
2020 13.2 7.9 5 0 0
2019 5.0 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.7 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339920 · OR · Milton Freewater

197 Fencing equipment (sporting goods) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 8 employers in Milton Freewater, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Resilite Sports Products, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilson Snow Inc 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR iFit Smithfield Production Facility 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Playtime 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harney Rock and Paving Company 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rose City Operations Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coos Bay North Bend Water Board 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Griffin Construction LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horizon Project 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01590 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0019-0019-01590 FAC-01590-MILTON FREEWATER-OR 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY 0019 1590 70 FTE
NAT-TCR 340 South Liberty St. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Palm Garden of Port St. Lucie, LLC 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale ShopRite 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Serco - Kapolei,HI 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eldridge Park Elementary School 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Plains Energy, LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hudson 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.