Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing · Minnesota

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc.

Lino Lakes, MN · ~72 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. safety composite

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc.: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333922 · Lino Lakes, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO Amazon Robotics BOS13
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon Robotics BOS13 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

361 Pneumatic tube conveyors manuf establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Pneumatic tube conveyors manuf employers in Minnesota.

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. (72 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Nol-Tec Systems, Inc.
Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. (72 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Nol-Tec Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333922 · MN · Lino Lakes

361 Pneumatic tube conveyors manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 42 employers in Lino Lakes, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon Robotics BOS13 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell Intelligrated - MD82 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR B.W. Sinclair, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pride Conveyance Systems: A Roeslein Company 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Jackson JAC1 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACI Asphalt and Concrete, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electrical Production Services Inc 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Soybean Processors 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA in Lino Lakes 5,690 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes 516 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCF - Lino Lakes 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1448 - Lino Lakes 353 FTE
NAT-TCR Niagara Bottling, LLC - Phoenix 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NGMS-F059 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Electric - Oklahoma City 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sherman Plastics Corporation 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pine View Care Center 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE MediLodge of Leelanau 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE TW Metals - LA 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire Headquarters 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.