Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing · Tennessee

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg

Dyersburg, TN · ~210 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg safety composite

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2020

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg injury rate improved

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.6 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Dyersburg, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #15/27
  • PHOTO FBD Partnership, LP
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~210 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FBD Partnership, LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg falls in its industry

461 Air-conditioning and warm air establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 27 Air-conditioning and warm air employers in Tennessee.

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg (210 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg
Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg (210 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Nortek Global HVAC Dyersburg has more employees than the Air-conditioning and warm air heating co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.1 2.1 3 1 0
2019 2.5 1.5 4 1 0
2018 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2017 3.0 1.7 7 0 0
2016 2.6 2.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · TN · Dyersburg

461 Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 64 employers in Dyersburg, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FBD Partnership, LP 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Newberry, SC-USA 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suburban MFG 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Worth Carton Metal 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weston Foods Bakery Wilson 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inteplast Group, BOPP Films 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Variform, Inc. dba Ply Gem Siding Group 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE IRIS USA, Inc. Mesquite TX 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR ERMCO COMPONENTS, INC. 2,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR ERMCO 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR NSK Steering Systems 569 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Tennessee Healthcare Dyersburg Hospital 400 FTE
NAT-TCR Berg Spiral pipe 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Howard Elementary 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson Elementary 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Production 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Inland Label and Marketing Services, LLC - Airport Rd. 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midway Distribution Center (DC2) 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Korona Candles Inc. 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weber Automotive Corporation 210 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.