General Warehousing and Storage · New Jersey

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2

Burlington, NJ · ~1,426 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2: 7.5 TCR = 129% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2019→2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2's TCR fell 3.0 from 9.0 in 2019 to 6.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.0 · 2020=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Burlington, NJ ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 129% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #276/333
  • PHOTO 127 ORLANDO FL
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~1,426 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 127 ORLANDO FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 averages 7.5 TCR (129% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 TCR series: 2019=9 · 2020=6 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #276 safest of 333 General Warehousing and Storag employers in New Jersey.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 (1,426 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 (1,426 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ACY2 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.0 5.5 72 5 0
2019 9.0 7.7 28 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Burlington

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 101 employers in Burlington, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 127 ORLANDO FL 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daimler Truck of North America 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keeco, LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liverpool DC00055 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE PSEG Power Nuclear 1,417 FTE
STATE-SIZE L3Harris 1,417 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florham Park 1,436 FTE
STATE-SIZE 89 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR COMPASSIONATE CARE HOSPICE GROUP LTD. 1,470 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY2 1,055 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY8 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR Express Scripts Pharmacy, Inc. Florence, NJ 587 FTE
NAT-TCR HFC - Clarksville 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1350,3270,8489 Kao 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CCI:CC019 - CC019-Snohomish, WA Office 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 786 Davie, Fl 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE NY Buy Office 1,426 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Francis Ministries 1,426 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB5 1,426 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE2 1,427 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.