General Warehousing and Storage · North Carolina

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4

Charlotte, NC · ~4,292 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4: 7.5 TCR = 129% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2019→2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4's TCR fell 5.5 from 10.3 in 2019 to 4.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.3 · 2020=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 129% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #288/330
  • PHOTO 127 ORLANDO FL
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 268 inj
  • SIZE ~4,292 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 127 ORLANDO FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 averages 7.5 TCR (129% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 TCR series: 2019=10.3 · 2020=4.7 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #288 safest of 330 General Warehousing and Storag employers in North Carolina.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 (4,292 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 (4,292 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT4 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.7 4.5 191 2 0
2019 10.3 9.6 77 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Charlotte

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 127 ORLANDO FL 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daimler Truck of North America 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keeco, LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liverpool DC00055 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CLT4 4,267 FTE
STATE-SIZE Day & Zimmermann NPS 4,182 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1004-CHS Corporate Operations 4,178 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Budd Group Janitorial 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR HFC - Clarksville 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1350,3270,8489 Kao 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CCI:CC019 - CC019-Snohomish, WA Office 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 786 Davie, Fl 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE WellSpan Medical Group 4,293 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MCO1 4,291 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Square Garden 4,290 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Corporation (MSK) 4,295 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.