MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Pennsylvania

Main Line HealthCare

Newtown Square, PA · ~1,263 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Main Line HealthCare runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Main Line HealthCare: 2.0 TCR = 54% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Main Line HealthCare safety composite

Main Line HealthCare scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2018

Main Line HealthCare injury rate improved

Main Line HealthCare's TCR fell 0.7 from 2.4 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Newtown Square, PA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #32/100
  • PHOTO St. Paul Allergy & A…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~1,263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Paul Allergy & Asthma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Main Line HealthCare in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Main Line HealthCare averages 2.0 TCR (54% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Main Line HealthCare TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=2 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Main Line HealthCare falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 100 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Pennsylvania.

Main Line HealthCare (1,263 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Main Line HealthCare
Main Line HealthCare (1,263 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Main Line HealthCare has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.7 0.3 20 0 0
2017 2.0 0.8 23 0 0
2016 2.4 1.0 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · PA · Newtown Square

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 34 employers in Newtown Square, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Paul Allergy & Asthma 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LivWell Community Health Services, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barnabas Health Medical Group, P.C. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Clinic 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE DePuy Synthes Sales West Chester 1,265 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philadelphia Home Health Services 1,267 FTE
STATE-SIZE Victaulic - Forks 1,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR PA00000033 Newton Square Donation Center 1,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunoco Ellis Administrative 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dunwoody Village 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Horse Village 397 FTE
NAT-TCR Chuck & Don's Pet Food & Supplies 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lonestar-Atlanta 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DSAR Decision 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sfd Clinton Plant Transportation -Est 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE HMAPF01 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX - Irving - 2304 Century Center Blvd - The American Bottling Company 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAS-National Aerospace Solutions at AEDC 1,263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.