General Warehousing and Storage · New Jersey

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9

Name: North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Carteret, NJ · ~3,039 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 4.1
Avg TCR: 5.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade B.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9: 4.1 TCR = 71% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2017→2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9's TCR fell 3.8 from 6.0 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.0 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Carteret, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 4.1 · 71% of ind

DART 1.9 DART
RANK #191/333
PHOTO 40886 CAPSTONE SUPER…
BOOK 4y book
INJ 361 inj
SIZE ~3,039 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 40886 CAPSTONE SUPERVALU STEVENS POINT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

This site

4.1
40886 CAPSTONE

4.1
50080 CAPSTONE

4.1
AHF Products

4.1
KLS INGREDION

4.1

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 averages 4.1 TCR (71% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 TCR series: 2017=6 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.2 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #191 safest of 333 General Warehousing and Storag employers in New Jersey.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 (3,039 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : EWR9 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2020	2.2	1.9	63	0
2019	4.2	3.4	74	2
2018	4.1	3.4	81	1
2017	6.0	4.7	143	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Carteret

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 37 employers in Carteret, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	40886 CAPSTONE SUPERVALU STEVENS POINT	STEVENS POINT, WI	4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	50080 CAPSTONE UNFI MONTGOMERY	MONTGOMERY, NY	4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	AHF Products	DICKSON, TN	4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	KLS INGREDION IL	SHOREWOOD, IL	4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Englewood Hospital and Medical Center	ENGLEWOOD	3,071 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Bristol Myers Squibb - Summit West Cell Therapy Manufacturing	SUMMIT	3,075 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Tender Touch Rehab Services	LAKEWOOD	2,997 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Novartis Pharmaceuticals Field Force	EAST HANOVER	2,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Amazon.com Services LLC - EWR9	Carteret	2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Amazon.com Services LLC - CDW5	Carteret	1,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cosmax USA	Carteret	685 FTE
CITY-NEAR	North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA7	Carteret	643 FTE
NAT-TCR	North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT2	Charlotte, NC	4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Global Specialty Fulfillment : UMA3	Boston, MA	4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Pocahontas Center	Marlington, WV	4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sti-Gc, LLC	San Antonio, TX	4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Sharp Memorial Hospital	San Diego, CA	3,039 FTE
NAT-SIZE	001Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas	Dallas, TX	3,038 FTE
NAT-SIZE	St. Luke's Physician's Group	Bethlehem, PA	3,041 FTE
NAT-SIZE	North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MCO1	Orlando, FL	3,036 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.