Elementary and secondary schools · North Carolina

Pitt County Schools

Greenville, NC · ~3,499 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pitt County Schools runs at 273% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Elementary and secondary schools workplace, earning a grade F.

Pitt County Schools: 3.8 TCR = 273% of Elementary and secondary schools BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pitt County Schools safety composite

Pitt County Schools scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2019→2023

Pitt County Schools injury rate improved

Pitt County Schools's TCR fell 0.5 from 4.7 in 2019 to 4.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2023=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Greenville, NC ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 3.8 · 273% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #8/19
  • PHOTO UCP - Administration
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 384 inj
  • SIZE ~3,499 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UCP - Administration (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pitt County Schools in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pitt County Schools averages 3.8 TCR (273% of the Elementary and secondary schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pitt County Schools TCR series: 2019=4.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2023=4.2 · BLS 1.4

Where Pitt County Schools falls in its industry

3,374 Elementary and secondary schoo establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 19 Elementary and secondary schoo employers in North Carolina.

Pitt County Schools (3,499 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pitt County Schools
Pitt County Schools (3,499 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Pitt County Schools has more employees than the Elementary and secondary schools median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.2 3.0 109 12 0
2021 3.5 0.3 87 6 0
2020 2.8 1.9 70 4 0
2019 4.7 3.8 118 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · NC · Greenville

3,374 Elementary and secondary schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 203 employers in Greenville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UCP - Administration 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cato-Meridian Central School District 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSD of Pike Township Eastbrook Elementary School 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson County Public Schools 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moore Regional Hospital 3,531 FTE
STATE-SIZE RPL 3,425 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davidson County Schools 3,351 FTE
STATE-SIZE 521 Northridge Distribution 3,312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vidant Medical Center 6,615 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Carolina Univeristy Core Campus 6,489 FTE
CITY-NEAR ECU Health Medical Center 6,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Carolina University Health Sciences Campus 2,957 FTE
NAT-TCR 6340-VIKING-001020_US_S0443 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Chi St Lukes Sugar Land 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Chenango Memorial 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-059-St. Clairsville ( RK-059 ) 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Perrigo : Michigan-Allegan (PMI) 3,500 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 3,496 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DTW1 3,502 FTE
NAT-SIZE Des Moines Methodist Hospital 3,495 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.