Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences · Minnesota

North American Science Associates - SLP

Minneapolis, MN · ~166 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North American Science Associates - SLP runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences workplace, earning a grade C.

North American Science Associates - SLP: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North American Science Associates - SLP safety composite

North American Science Associates - SLP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

North American Science Associates - SLP held a steady TCR band

North American Science Associates - SLP's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541711 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO GSK/ViiV- Durham
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GSK/ViiV- Durham (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

North American Science Associates - SLP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North American Science Associates - SLP averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North American Science Associates - SLP TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 0.5

Where North American Science Associates - SLP falls in its industry

189 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 Biotechnology research and dev employers in Minnesota.

North American Science Associates - SLP (166 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate North American Science Associates - SLP
North American Science Associates - SLP (166 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8

North American Science Associates - SLP has fewer employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541711 · MN · Minneapolis

189 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GSK/ViiV- Durham 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Flavors and Fragrances 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bosch Security Systems 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE IntriCon - Arden Hills 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Resonetics Blaine 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elk River Ford, Inc. 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indus Road & Bridge 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE 401 Collins 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE 44221d - South Dc 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Place Health & Rehabilitation, LLC 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.