Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · North Carolina

North Carolina

Charlotte, NC · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Carolina runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

North Carolina: 4.9 TCR = 144% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Carolina safety composite

North Carolina scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

North Carolina injury rate improved

North Carolina's TCR fell 3.3 from 4.6 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 444110 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 144% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #157/294
  • PHOTO Naples
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Naples (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

North Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Carolina averages 4.9 TCR (144% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Carolina TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.4

Where North Carolina falls in its industry

6,309 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 294 Addition, alteration and renov employers in North Carolina.

North Carolina (41 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North Carolina
North Carolina (41 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.7

North Carolina has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 7.3 7.3 2 0 0
2019 13.2 0.0 3 0 0
2018 7.6 7.6 2 0 0
2016 4.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

444110 · NC · Charlotte

6,309 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Naples 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1618 LOWE S OF WEYMOUTH MA 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR VERNON HILLS IL - 3327 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4602 STERLING PARK 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Barnes LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sandhill Turf 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewiston NC Operation 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hendersonville Operations Center 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Palmdale 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR EPD, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Prism - NV 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vinwood Cellars 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Samscreen, Inc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delaware River Stevedores - Port of Wilmington 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma Shirt Company 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Tanks LLC 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.