Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · South Carolina

North Charleston Facility

North Charleston, SC · ~92 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Charleston Facility runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

North Charleston Facility: 5.0 TCR = 150% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Charleston Facility safety composite

North Charleston Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

North Charleston Facility: 1.9 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.63× in 2019

North Charleston Facility's TCR rose 6.2 from 1.9 in 2017 to 8.1 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · North Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 150% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO HP Hood, LLC- Concor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HP Hood, LLC- Concord, NH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

North Charleston Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Charleston Facility averages 5.0 TCR (150% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Charleston Facility TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2019=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where North Charleston Facility falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in South Carolina.

North Charleston Facility (92 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate North Charleston Facility
North Charleston Facility (92 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

North Charleston Facility has fewer employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.1 8.1 9 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · SC · North Charleston

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HP Hood, LLC- Concord, NH 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWY-0045-0045-08416 FAC-08416-SAN LEANDRO-CA 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6400-SWY 0045 8420 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Idaho Milk Products 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Johnson's Roofing Service Inc 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE CarolinaPower Inc BR22 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC SC FeedMill 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panel Truss Townville, LLC. 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Honey Island Mill 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rugo Stone, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1059-CHS Mobile Medicine 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nextgen Systems LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Leicht Transfer & Storage - De Pere 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : South Hatfield, MA (GDC) 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covanta Fairfax, Inc. 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&B Manufacturing, Inc. 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.