Distribution of electric power · Pennsylvania

North Shore Locations

Pittsburgh, PA · ~880 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Shore Locations runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

North Shore Locations: 1.3 TCR = 110% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Shore Locations safety composite

North Shore Locations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

North Shore Locations held a steady TCR band

North Shore Locations's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.5 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.3 · 110% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #18/58
  • PHOTO Consolidated Coopera…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 92 inj
  • SIZE ~880 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Consolidated Cooperative (Mount Gilead facility) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

North Shore Locations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Shore Locations averages 1.3 TCR (110% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Shore Locations TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 1.2

Where North Shore Locations falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 58 Distribution of electric power employers in Pennsylvania.

North Shore Locations (880 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North Shore Locations
North Shore Locations (880 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

North Shore Locations has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.9 13 0 0
2023 1.0 0.5 8 0 0
2022 1.1 0.8 9 0 0
2021 1.5 1.0 10 3 0
2020 1.3 0.9 10 1 0
2019 1.7 0.6 14 1 0
2018 0.8 0.5 7 0 0
2017 1.5 0.9 12 0 0
2016 1.5 0.8 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · PA · Pittsburgh

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Cooperative (Mount Gilead facility) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Cooperative (Delaware facility) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walton EMC - Monroe Office 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BENBROOK SV CTR 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CMBK Resort Holdings LLC 879 FTE
STATE-SIZE CS Wholesale Grocers : Bethlehem IV, PA (GDC) 878 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anns Choice 877 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office Building 884 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR ACP Main Office 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Power Design Inc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UFPD - Ada Drive 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vita-Mix Corporation - Morgan Court 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mdldc - Dc Building 880 FTE
NAT-SIZE Table Mountain Casino 880 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-WIMIL104 880 FTE
NAT-SIZE 161541-Chicago Ndc 880 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.