Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Idaho

North Star Retirement Community

Coeur D'Alene, ID · ~66 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North Star Retirement Community runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

North Star Retirement Community: 5.9 TCR = 154% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North Star Retirement Community safety composite

North Star Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2022→2023

North Star Retirement Community injury rate improved

North Star Retirement Community's TCR fell 3.8 from 7.8 in 2022 to 4.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.8 · 2023=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Coeur D'Alene, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 154% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #6/36
  • PHOTO Meadowlark Retiremen…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meadowlark Retirement Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

North Star Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North Star Retirement Community averages 5.9 TCR (154% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North Star Retirement Community TCR series: 2022=7.8 · 2023=4 · BLS 3.8

Where North Star Retirement Community falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 36 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Idaho.

North Star Retirement Community (66 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate North Star Retirement Community
North Star Retirement Community (66 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

North Star Retirement Community has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2022 7.8 7.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · ID · Coeur D'Alene

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 44 employers in Coeur D'Alene, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meadowlark Retirement Village 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landings of Mills River 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Pointe Assisted Living of Archdale 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adams House 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Petra Incorporated 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Magic Services (Jerome) 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACI NW inc. Civil 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meadow Gold Boise - Boise 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0773 - COEUR D'ALENE ID WHSE 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0679 - Coeur d'Alene 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Idaho Distributing 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifecare Center of Coeur D'Alene 144 FTE
NAT-TCR Tennessee Tractor LLC - Trenton 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fred Netterville Lumber Company 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Parts Authority PA Southern 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edenwald 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norlake Manufacturing Company 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pasadena Skid & Pallet, Inc. 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE SDF Louisville International Airport 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.