Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic · California

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center

San Diego, CA · ~225 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center runs at 280% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic workplace, earning a grade F.

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center: 5.9 TCR = 280% of Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center safety composite

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center: 2.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2023

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center's TCR rose 1.4 from 2.0 in 2021 to 3.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 280% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #36/69
  • PHOTO James Center YMCA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: James Center YMCA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center averages 5.9 TCR (280% of the Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center TCR series: 2021=2 · 2022=12.1 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 2.1

Where South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center falls in its industry

298 Fraternal associations or lodg establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 69 Fraternal associations or lodg employers in California.

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center (225 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center
South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center (225 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

South Bay Family YMCA and Teen Center has more employees than the Fraternal associations or lodges, social median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.5 2.6 4 0 0
2022 12.1 11.1 6 6 0
2021 2.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · CA · San Diego

298 Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR James Center YMCA 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Buren Shelter 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Ash YMCA Branch 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCY - FR Itil 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trinity Packing Company 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floradale 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE CINNABAR SERVICE CENTER 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresno Water Division 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Fred Netterville Lumber Company 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SWS Retail - Caldwell 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tennessee Tractor LLC - Trenton 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Lincoln 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE IES Commercial, Inc - San Antonio 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (PIL-6468) 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fresh #801 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hale Products Inc 225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.