Construction management, single-family building · California

Northern CA Division

Roseville, CA · ~92 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northern CA Division runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, single-family building workplace, earning a grade B.

Northern CA Division: 2.0 TCR = 52% of Construction management, single-family building BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northern CA Division safety composite

Northern CA Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2017→2024

Northern CA Division injury rate improved

Northern CA Division's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/178
  • PHOTO Campbell Homes LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Campbell Homes LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Northern CA Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northern CA Division averages 2.0 TCR (52% of the Construction management, single-family building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northern CA Division TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Northern CA Division falls in its industry

976 Construction management, singl establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 178 Construction management, singl employers in California.

Northern CA Division (92 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Northern CA Division
Northern CA Division (92 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Northern CA Division has more employees than the Construction management, single-family b median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2020 4.1 0.0 2 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.5 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · CA · Roseville

976 Construction management, single-family building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Campbell Homes LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - New Jersey 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The McKernon Group, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MainVue Homes, LLC. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nunez Ag, Inc. 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Vineyard Management, Inc. 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terra Bella Nursery 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glass House Group Inc. 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR 60511 - Capstone Hardins Sysco Memphis 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SW Stationary & Bank Supply 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sabre Tubular Structures 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Everglades College DBA Keiser 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Columbus 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moncks Corner Elementary formally Berkeley Intermediate School 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Hall 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Track Gulf Shores 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.