Transmission of electric power · Colorado

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center

Frederick, CO · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Transmission of electric power workplace, earning a grade B.

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center: 0.9 TCR = 79% of Transmission of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center safety composite

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center held a steady TCR band

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Frederick, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO Oncor Transmission O…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oncor Transmission Operation Metro East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northern Colorado Maintenance Center averages 0.9 TCR (79% of the Transmission of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Northern Colorado Maintenance Center falls in its industry

263 Transmission of electric power establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Transmission of electric power employers in Colorado.

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center (34 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Northern Colorado Maintenance Center
Northern Colorado Maintenance Center (34 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Northern Colorado Maintenance Center has fewer employees than the Transmission of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · CO · Frederick

263 Transmission of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 39 employers in Frederick, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oncor Transmission Operation Metro East 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Marion Maintenance 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montrose Maintenance Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nucla Generating Station 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Limon Headquarters 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brikor Associates Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Aurora Maintenance Facility 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otter Products Salazar 1,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otter Products - Salazar 519 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otter Products - Frederick Distribution Center 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR UMC, Inc - Colorado 217 FTE
NAT-TCR DTI Transportation Services II Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rice Drywall, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dodson 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Roof Maintenance 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sycamore Specialized Carriers Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1093 Juniata County SD 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midland Texas 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.