General warehousing and storage · Maryland

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center

Curtis Bay, MD · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center: 8.9 TCR = 154% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center safety composite

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.2

2020→2024

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center injury rate improved

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center's TCR fell 19.2 from 19.2 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=19.2 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Curtis Bay, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.9 · 154% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #121/148
  • PHOTO RSCG - Phoenix Wareh…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RSCG - Phoenix Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center averages 8.9 TCR (154% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center TCR series: 2020=19.2 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #121 safest of 148 General warehousing and storag employers in Maryland.

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center (34 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center
Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center (34 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Nissan Baltimore Parts Distribution Center has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2022 9.5 6.3 3 0 0
2020 19.2 19.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MD · Curtis Bay

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 22 employers in Curtis Bay, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RSCG - Phoenix Warehouse 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 8074 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wegmans GMDC 3131 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leviton Manufacturing Co. Inc 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE FOXBOROUGH NURSERY, INC. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE WGL MD - Frederick 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2017116 - Purple Line OMF 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE FMS Construction - Maryland 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brandon Shores 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manuel Luis Construction Company, Inc./M Luis Products, LLC 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAL-ODFL 134 FTE
NAT-TCR Detroit 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TATRO Plumbing Co. Inc. 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Houck Construction Materials Inc 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - Zephyrhills 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northern Colorado Maintenance Center 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sycamore Specialized Carriers Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1093 Juniata County SD 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midland Texas 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.