Correctional institutions · Connecticut

Northern Correctional Institution

Somers, CT · ~168 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northern Correctional Institution runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade D.

Northern Correctional Institution: 5.9 TCR = 183% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northern Correctional Institution safety composite

Northern Correctional Institution scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Northern Correctional Institution held a steady TCR band

Northern Correctional Institution's TCR held near 0.1 from 6.1 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.1 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Somers, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 183% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #7/19
  • PHOTO Roederer Correctiona…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roederer Correctional Complex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Northern Correctional Institution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northern Correctional Institution averages 5.9 TCR (183% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northern Correctional Institution TCR series: 2017=6.1 · 2018=5 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=6.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Northern Correctional Institution falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 19 Correctional institutions employers in Connecticut.

Northern Correctional Institution (168 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Northern Correctional Institution
Northern Correctional Institution (168 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Northern Correctional Institution has fewer employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.2 6.2 4 0 0
2020 5.8 5.8 9 0 0
2019 6.4 6.4 9 2 0
2018 5.0 5.0 8 1 0
2017 6.1 6.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · CT · Somers

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 13 employers in Somers, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roederer Correctional Complex 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northpoint Training Center 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCF - Lino Lakes 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MacDougall-Walker Correctional Institution 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Town of Greenwich Department of Public Works 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laticrete - Bethany 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3495-10D8191 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE STOP & SHOP 100657 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osborn Correctional Institution 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarter 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osborn Correctional institution - Health services 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 129 FTE
NAT-TCR Mutual Distributing Company - Charlotte 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lawrence Transportation - Roanoke 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1174 - North Brunswick Nj Whse 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Progressive Machine Die Inc 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Performance Denver - 1024 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Temperature Equipment Corporation 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamond Mattress Company Inc. 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tpc Wire and Cable Corp 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.