Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Ohio

Progressive Machine Die Inc

Macedonia, OH · ~33 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Progressive Machine Die Inc runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Progressive Machine Die Inc: 5.9 TCR = 178% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Progressive Machine Die Inc safety composite

Progressive Machine Die Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Progressive Machine Die Inc: 2.8 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Progressive Machine Die Inc's TCR rose 3.2 from 2.8 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Macedonia, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 178% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/39
  • PHOTO Logistics Mgmt and E…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Logistics Mgmt and Engineering (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Progressive Machine Die Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Progressive Machine Die Inc averages 5.9 TCR (178% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Progressive Machine Die Inc TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=6 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=6 · BLS 3.3

Where Progressive Machine Die Inc falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 39 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Ohio.

Progressive Machine Die Inc (33 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Progressive Machine Die Inc
Progressive Machine Die Inc (33 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Progressive Machine Die Inc has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 6.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 6.0 0.0 2 0 0
2018 8.6 0.0 3 0 0
2017 5.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · OH · Macedonia

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 70 employers in Macedonia, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Logistics Mgmt and Engineering 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autodie 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paragon D&E 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tools Inc Sussex 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Foertmeyer & Sons Greenhouse 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 1 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holmes-Wayne Electric Cooperative, Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Philadelphia Service Building 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Day Corporate 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Day Improvements Corporate 381 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1927 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1927 293 FTE
NAT-TCR Lawrence Transportation - Roanoke 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mutual Distributing Company - Charlotte 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Correctional Institution 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockwell Drywall, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 000001-Memphis Tn (Riverside) 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunrise Ag Cooperative Buckman 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Woods of Mt.Vernon 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mellott Manufacturing Company, Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.