General Government · Minnesota

NorthPoint Health & Wellness

Minneapolis, MN · ~224 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NorthPoint Health & Wellness runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General Government workplace, earning a grade B.

NorthPoint Health & Wellness: 2.7 TCR = 70% of General Government BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NorthPoint Health & Wellness safety composite

NorthPoint Health & Wellness scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2023

NorthPoint Health & Wellness injury rate improved

NorthPoint Health & Wellness's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.5 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.5 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #133/419
  • PHOTO Independence Family …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Independence Family Hlth Ctr (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

NorthPoint Health & Wellness in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NorthPoint Health & Wellness averages 2.7 TCR (70% of the General Government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NorthPoint Health & Wellness TCR series: 2017=2.5 · 2018=1 · 2019=2 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.8

Where NorthPoint Health & Wellness falls in its industry

2,836 General Government establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #133 safest of 419 General Government employers in Minnesota.

NorthPoint Health & Wellness (224 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NorthPoint Health & Wellness
NorthPoint Health & Wellness (224 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

NorthPoint Health & Wellness has more employees than the General Government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 0.0 4 0 0
2022 5.1 1.5 9 1 0
2021 4.3 0.0 8 0 0
2020 1.6 0.5 2 1 0
2019 2.0 0.5 4 0 0
2018 1.0 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.5 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Minneapolis

2,836 General Government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Independence Family Hlth Ctr 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hudson County Correctional Center 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gundersen - Viroqua Clinic 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30814) 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Riverside 2700 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connexus Energy 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reckitt (MeadJohnson LLC) 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Print and Visual Impressions - Fridley MN - 0223-MNFR1 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR ATL Atlanta 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Birmingham - BMD 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 3D Concrete LLC sparks plant 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR National Management Resources Lyon College 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Worthington Hotel 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Villa St. Francis Catholic Care Center Inc 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Production Plumbing Riverside 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE HealthCare Partners MSO 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.