Building cleaning services, janitorial · Arkansas

National Management Resources Lyon College

Batesville, AR · ~24 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

National Management Resources Lyon College runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade B.

National Management Resources Lyon College: 2.7 TCR = 59% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

National Management Resources Lyon College safety composite

National Management Resources Lyon College scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

National Management Resources Lyon College: 0.0 → 8.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

National Management Resources Lyon College's TCR rose 8.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 8.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Batesville, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #43/69
  • PHOTO El Paso Office
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: El Paso Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

National Management Resources Lyon College in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows National Management Resources Lyon College averages 2.7 TCR (59% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

National Management Resources Lyon College TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=8 · BLS 4.5

Where National Management Resources Lyon College falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 69 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Arkansas.

National Management Resources Lyon College (24 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate National Management Resources Lyon College
National Management Resources Lyon College (24 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

National Management Resources Lyon College has fewer employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AR · Batesville

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 57 employers in Batesville, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR El Paso Office 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Executive Managment Services - Vince 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8051 U of L Jewish Frazier Hospital 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 843 3500 Lacey 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peco Foods Inc-Live Haul 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Gin Co 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE AECI - Dell Power Plant 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Producers Rice Mill, Inc. Stuttgart Construction 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Batesville Processing 6,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peco Foods 1,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR White River Medical Center 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Future Fuel Chemical Company 477 FTE
NAT-TCR Birmingham - BMD 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shearer's Foods - Brewster 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NorthPoint Health & Wellness 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ATL Atlanta 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amrep Salisbury 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Versalift Mid West LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vannph-Jov-Aatc Newport News Php 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadows Saw Facility 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.