Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing · Arizona

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles

Chandler, AZ · ~2,289 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles safety composite

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles held a steady TCR band

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.4 in 2020 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.4 · 2021=0.2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336414 · Chandler, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~2,289 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Littleton Deer Crk Cnyn (1003) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles TCR series: 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles falls in its industry

82 Guided missile and space vehic establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Guided missile and space vehic employers in Arizona.

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles (2,289 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles
Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles (2,289 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 504 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Northrop Grumman Launch Vehicles has more employees than the Guided missile and space vehicle manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.2 0.2 6 0 0
2021 0.2 0.2 2 2 0
2020 0.4 0.4 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336414 · AZ · Chandler

82 Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 462 employers in Chandler, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Littleton Deer Crk Cnyn (1003) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AL Huntsville Bradford 4800 (1350) 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Palo Verde Campus 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Woburn_MA 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shea Medical Center Campus 2,280 FTE
STATE-SIZE tsmc 2,276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - PHX6 2,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chandler Campus 6,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocotillo Campus 5,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030510 3,265 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030510-510001 2,446 FTE
NAT-TCR Fives Intralogistics Corp. 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Department of Public Works, Bureau of Street Lighting, Public Works Building 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Triversity Construction Company, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Charleston, WV 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jefferson University Physicians 2,289 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - FWA4 2,290 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tech Data Clearwater 2,288 FTE
NAT-SIZE AK Steel - Middletown Works 2,288 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.