Skilled nursing facilities · New York

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center

Brooklyn, NY · ~228 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center: 3.3 TCR = 51% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center safety composite

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2018→2024

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center injury rate improved

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center's TCR fell 3.7 from 5.0 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.0 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Brooklyn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 51% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #145/616
  • PHOTO THE BRIDGE AT LAKE P…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: THE BRIDGE AT LAKE POINTE LANDING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center averages 3.3 TCR (51% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center TCR series: 2018=5 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center (228 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center
Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center (228 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 6 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 5 2 0
2020 3.5 3.5 6 0 0
2019 4.3 4.3 8 0 0
2018 5.0 5.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Brooklyn

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR THE BRIDGE AT LAKE POINTE LANDING 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Gerards Community of Care 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kenansville Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portsmouth Health & Rehab 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 110 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE RemArms, LLC 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens Illinois 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2916 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Fork Lodge 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Houston 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aero Arc Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fire Mountain Gems and Beads 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE E&K of Denver, Inc. 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westwood 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Machine and Engineering - Third Street 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.