Highway Repair Maintenance · Virginia

NOVA District Bridge Crews

Fairfax, VA · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NOVA District Bridge Crews runs at 213% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Highway Repair Maintenance workplace, earning a grade F.

NOVA District Bridge Crews: 6.0 TCR = 213% of Highway Repair Maintenance BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NOVA District Bridge Crews safety composite

NOVA District Bridge Crews scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NOVA District Bridge Crews: 0.0 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

NOVA District Bridge Crews's TCR rose 4.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Fairfax, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 213% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #105/141
  • PHOTO Eastern Iowa Excavat…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eastern Iowa Excavating & Concrete LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

NOVA District Bridge Crews in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NOVA District Bridge Crews averages 6.0 TCR (213% of the Highway Repair Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NOVA District Bridge Crews TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=12.4 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=5 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 2.8

Where NOVA District Bridge Crews falls in its industry

4,078 Highway Repair Maintenance establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 141 Highway Repair Maintenance employers in Virginia.

NOVA District Bridge Crews (25 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate NOVA District Bridge Crews
NOVA District Bridge Crews (25 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

NOVA District Bridge Crews has fewer employees than the Highway Repair Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 12.6 12.6 3 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2019 8.8 8.8 2 0 0
2018 12.4 12.4 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · VA · Fairfax

4,078 Highway Repair Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 226 employers in Fairfax, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eastern Iowa Excavating & Concrete LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transportation Streets and Traffic 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pyramid Paving and Contracting Co. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SACC 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowman Orchards, LLc 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle W Farms II, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manufacturing Plant 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowman Fruit Sales LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Health System 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Physician Group 2,539 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inova Fair Oaks Hospital 1,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Virginia Community College - Annandale 870 FTE
NAT-TCR SJSU Dining Commons 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Senior Living 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nissin International Transport - Square Drive, Marysville, OH 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0144 - Rivergate 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 060-DNN 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona Post Tension 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Servpro of Easton, Bethlehem & Whitehall 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franz Family Bakeries Tacoma Pacific 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.