Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Indiana

NTN Driveshaft Anderson

Anderson, IN · ~356 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NTN Driveshaft Anderson runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

NTN Driveshaft Anderson: 3.6 TCR = 66% of Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NTN Driveshaft Anderson safety composite

NTN Driveshaft Anderson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NTN Driveshaft Anderson: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.11× in 2024

NTN Driveshaft Anderson's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Anderson, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #27/41
  • PHOTO ATC Drivetrain ALC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 90 inj
  • SIZE ~356 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATC Drivetrain ALC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

NTN Driveshaft Anderson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NTN Driveshaft Anderson averages 3.6 TCR (66% of the Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NTN Driveshaft Anderson TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=7 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 5.4

Where NTN Driveshaft Anderson falls in its industry

320 Drive shafts and half shafts, establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 41 Drive shafts and half shafts, employers in Indiana.

NTN Driveshaft Anderson (356 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NTN Driveshaft Anderson
NTN Driveshaft Anderson (356 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

NTN Driveshaft Anderson has more employees than the Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.4 8 0 0
2023 1.5 0.8 8 0 0
2022 2.2 1.6 11 0 0
2021 5.2 3.1 25 0 0
2019 7.0 5.9 19 0 0
2018 7.4 6.5 15 0 0
2017 3.5 1.7 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · IN · Anderson

320 Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 103 employers in Anderson, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATC Drivetrain ALC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GHSP 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Production Machining, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danville Machining 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Red Gold Inc. - Geneva 356 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEG Electric Corp 356 FTE
STATE-SIZE BMW 356 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1033 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter Express Inc 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital Anderson 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARRAH'S HOOSIER PARK RACING & CASINO 804 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle USA 798 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABE5 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Piedmont Aviation Component Services 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Victoria Palms 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hostess Brands LLC- Columbus 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - ACY9 356 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Trucking 356 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cosma Casting Michigan 356 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tige Boats Inc. 356 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.