Engineering services · Indiana

Cummins Technical Center

Columbus, IN · ~1,174 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cummins Technical Center runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Engineering services workplace, earning a grade C.

Cummins Technical Center: 0.4 TCR = 84% of Engineering services BLS 0.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cummins Technical Center safety composite

Cummins Technical Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cummins Technical Center held a steady TCR band

Cummins Technical Center's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Columbus, IN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 0.4 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO Industrial Tech Serv…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~1,174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Industrial Tech Services Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Cummins Technical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cummins Technical Center averages 0.4 TCR (84% of the Engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cummins Technical Center TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Cummins Technical Center falls in its industry

690 Engineering services establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Engineering services employers in Indiana.

Cummins Technical Center (1,174 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cummins Technical Center
Cummins Technical Center (1,174 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Cummins Technical Center has more employees than the Engineering services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.1 4 0 0
2023 0.4 0.2 5 0 0
2022 0.4 0.2 3 1 0
2021 0.4 0.2 5 0 0
2020 0.3 0.2 4 0 0
2019 0.1 0.1 2 0 0
2018 0.6 0.2 8 0 0
2017 0.7 0.1 9 0 0
2016 0.5 0.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · IN · Columbus

690 Engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 141 employers in Columbus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Industrial Tech Services Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boston Dynamics Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bolton & Menk - Maplewood 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CommScope Technologies LLC (Ashburn, VA) 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Samtec 1,176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hancock Wellness Center and Medical Office McCordsville 1,178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transportation Department 1,167 FTE
STATE-SIZE IN - Nike Returns 1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Material Handling, Inc. 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR NTN Driveshaft Inc. 1,756 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Engine Plant 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons Office Building 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR Pioneer Americas LLC, Henderson Plant 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Herald Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Landstar - Jacksonville HQ 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Genesis Energy Offshore Pipeline 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE St Anthony North Health Campus 1,174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CMH3 1,174 FTE
NAT-SIZE 287142-St Louis Mo P&Dc 1,174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intralox New Orleans 1,174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.