Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Florida

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I

Sebring, FL · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I: 3.0 TCR = 79% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I safety composite

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I held a steady TCR band

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I's TCR held near 0.0 from 3.0 in 2021 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.0 · 2022=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Sebring, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 79% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #6/21
  • PHOTO 5917 Evergreen Way
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5917 Evergreen Way (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I averages 3.0 TCR (79% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I TCR series: 2021=3 · 2022=3 · BLS 3.8

Where NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 21 Activity centers for disabled employers in Florida.

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I (43 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I
NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I (43 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · FL · Sebring

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 57 employers in Sebring, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5917 Evergreen Way 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1521 Clark Street Rd. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Always There, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cerebral Palsy Association of Nassau County, Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PINTO'S FARM 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fernlea Nurseries - STU 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRP Boca Raton Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stuart Office 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Heartland Medical Center 1,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Sebring 1,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 666 405 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Highlands Hospital 399 FTE
NAT-TCR Drywall Systems Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Yarde Metals, Limerick 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR OKC-ODFL 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt Paper GA, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Petco, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rig Masters Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living,Inc 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.