Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Florida
NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I
Sebring, FL · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 3.0
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 3.0
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 2
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.
Where NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I falls in its industry
1,535 Activity centers for disabled establishmentsSafer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.
Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 25 Activity centers for disabled employers in Florida.
NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I has an average TCR of 3.0, which is 79% of the industry average (3.8) for Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This is better than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I
Between 2021 and 2022, NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 3.0 to 3.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 0% change across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2021, at a TCR of 3.0, while 2021 saw the highest rate, at 3.0, a spread of 0.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I recorded 2 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 624120 - Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2022)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 67,000 hours worked = 2.99 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I (this establishment) | 2.99 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities industry avg | 3.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 624120 |
| Florida state avg (all industries) | 4.57 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2022: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 79% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities benchmark, NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I's safety grade?
How many injuries has NU-HOPE Elder Care Services, I reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within Florida - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~3.0)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.