Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing · South Carolina

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team

Columbia, SC · ~43 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team safety composite

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team held a steady TCR band

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2020=2.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Sherman Tx Trackwork
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sherman Tx Trackwork (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=2 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team falls in its industry

208 Brakes and parts for railroad establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Brakes and parts for railroad employers in South Carolina.

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team (43 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team
Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team (43 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Wabtec Global Services PTC-Field Team has fewer employees than the Brakes and parts for railroad rolling st median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · SC · Columbia

208 Brakes and parts for railroad rolling stock manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sherman Tx Trackwork 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Tank Car - Plant 1200 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity tank Car Plant 200 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alliance, NE (EMD) 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coastal Greenhouses, LLC -SC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Greenhouses - SC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seckinger Forest Products Inc 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Electric Cooperative 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Zealous Energy Services LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Rim Constructors Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lubbers 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Petco, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Senior Living,Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joao & Bradley Construction Co., Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rig Masters Inc 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.