Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing · California

Nutra Blend - Madera

Madera, CA · ~84 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nutra Blend - Madera runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Nutra Blend - Madera: 3.0 TCR = 77% of Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nutra Blend - Madera safety composite

Nutra Blend - Madera scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2018→2023

Nutra Blend - Madera injury rate improved

Nutra Blend - Madera's TCR fell 2.5 from 4.9 in 2018 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.9 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Madera, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #13/36
  • PHOTO PAN AMERICAN GRAIN C…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PAN AMERICAN GRAIN COMPANY-CORUJO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Nutra Blend - Madera in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nutra Blend - Madera averages 3.0 TCR (77% of the Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nutra Blend - Madera TCR series: 2018=4.9 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=0 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.9

Where Nutra Blend - Madera falls in its industry

756 Animal feeds, prepared (except establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 36 Animal feeds, prepared (except employers in California.

Nutra Blend - Madera (84 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Nutra Blend - Madera
Nutra Blend - Madera (84 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Nutra Blend - Madera has more employees than the Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.4 2.2 2 1 0
2019 4.3 3.2 4 0 0
2018 4.9 2.5 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · CA · Madera

756 Animal feeds, prepared (except dog and cat), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 162 employers in Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PAN AMERICAN GRAIN COMPANY-CORUJO 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition - Stockton 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Science 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vita Plus - Distribution Center 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE montalvo farms 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hansen Custom Farming, LLC 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilarides Dairy 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntyre Labor Service, LLC. 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Farm Management Inc 17,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroff Ag Services Inc 2,253 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 170 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Madera 1,393 FTE
NAT-TCR Ctp - Langley Afb, Va 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Thielsch Engineering Office - Braintree MA 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Strata Corporation 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Face to Face Health & Counseling - Clinic 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley Distributors, Inc 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISD# 834-Lake Elmo Elementary 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE DATTCO - Bridgeport 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alproem Engineering Contractors Corp./Oficina Centrales 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.