Enzyme proteins (i.e., basic synthetic chemicals) (except pharmaceutical use) manufacturing · North Carolina

NZNA - Franklinton

Franklinton, NC · ~647 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NZNA - Franklinton runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Enzyme proteins (i.e., basic synthetic chemicals) (except pharmaceutical use) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

NZNA - Franklinton: 1.7 TCR = 51% of Enzyme proteins (i.e., basic synthetic chemicals) (except pharmaceutical use) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NZNA - Franklinton safety composite

NZNA - Franklinton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NZNA - Franklinton: 1.1 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2020

NZNA - Franklinton's TCR rose 1.4 from 1.1 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Franklinton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 51% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #14/25
  • PHOTO Arclin USA - Springf…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~647 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arclin USA - Springfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

NZNA - Franklinton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NZNA - Franklinton averages 1.7 TCR (51% of the Enzyme proteins (i.e., basic synthetic chemicals) (except pharmaceutical use) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NZNA - Franklinton TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where NZNA - Franklinton falls in its industry

552 Enzyme proteins (i.e., basic s establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 25 Enzyme proteins (i.e., basic s employers in North Carolina.

NZNA - Franklinton (647 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate NZNA - Franklinton
NZNA - Franklinton (647 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

NZNA - Franklinton has more employees than the Enzyme proteins (i.e., basic synthetic c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.5 1.4 9 3 0
2019 1.7 1.0 10 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 11 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 3 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · NC · Franklinton

552 Enzyme proteins (i.e., basic synthetic chemicals) (except pharmaceutical use) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 10 employers in Franklinton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arclin USA - Springfield 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americas Resins and Global FM : Geismar 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sasol Chemicals (USA) LLC, Oil City Plant 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OH100 Columbus Chemical 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Butterball LLC- Raeford, NC 646 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Plastics 648 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0050-CHS Lincoln 648 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teleflex Morrisville 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novozymes Franklinton 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR 01421 - STORE # 1421 FRANKLINTON 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lindsay Precast, Inc. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lindsay Precast Stay Right Division 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dedham Ma Store 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WSP Jackson 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LSC Communications 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aflac Group 647 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Anaheim, Police Department Main Station 647 FTE
NAT-SIZE HYVE Fremont Manu 647 FTE
NAT-SIZE Axcelis Beverly 647 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.