Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Oak Leaf Manor North

Landisville, PA · ~85 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oak Leaf Manor North runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oak Leaf Manor North: 8.4 TCR = 222% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oak Leaf Manor North safety composite

Oak Leaf Manor North scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2017→2022

Oak Leaf Manor North injury rate improved

Oak Leaf Manor North's TCR fell 7.7 from 7.8 in 2017 to 0.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 93.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.8 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=93.1 · 2021=13.6 · 2022=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Landisville, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 222% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #150/257
  • PHOTO Brightwater Retireme…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brightwater Retirement, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Oak Leaf Manor North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oak Leaf Manor North averages 8.4 TCR (222% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oak Leaf Manor North TCR series: 2017=7.8 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=93.1 · 2021=13.6 · 2022=0.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Oak Leaf Manor North falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Oak Leaf Manor North (85 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oak Leaf Manor North
Oak Leaf Manor North (85 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Oak Leaf Manor North has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.1 0.1 8 0 0
2021 13.6 6.8 2 6 0
2020 93.1 46.5 30 30 0
2019 12.3 0.0 8 0 0
2017 7.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Landisville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 16 employers in Landisville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brightwater Retirement, LLC 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welcov Assisted Living at Kearney 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Georgetowne Place 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-St. Andrews Estates 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bear Mountain Orchards, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE SFC System Facility Center 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTY - MidAtlantic - Harrisburg,PA 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Buncher Company 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utilimaster- Landisville, PA 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR 108 IND - LANDISVILLE 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR LANDISVILLE 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wind River Environmental Salunga, PA 100 FTE
NAT-TCR ACR Home on 178th 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BFL-ODFL 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethany Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ecolab-McDonough 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCH Evergreen Clinic 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tribute at One Loudoun 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colt Inc 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.