Supermarkets · California

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista

Chula Vista, CA · ~87 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista runs at 248% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Supermarkets workplace, earning a grade F.

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista: 8.4 TCR = 248% of Supermarkets BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista safety composite

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2017→2022

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista injury rate improved

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista's TCR fell 3.3 from 6.3 in 2017 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.3 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=14.0 · 2022=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Chula Vista, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 248% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #2952/4686
  • PHOTO Mississippi Market E…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mississippi Market E7 Store (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista averages 8.4 TCR (248% of the Supermarkets BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista TCR series: 2017=6.3 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=14 · 2022=3 · BLS 3.4

Where Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista falls in its industry

30,654 Supermarkets establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2952 safest of 4686 Supermarkets employers in California.

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista (87 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista
Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista (87 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Seafood City Supermarket - Chula Vista has fewer employees than the Supermarkets median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2021 14.0 5.6 9 1 1
2020 9.8 5.6 7 0 0
2019 5.8 1.4 4 0 0
2018 11.7 7.3 8 0 0
2017 6.3 4.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · CA · Chula Vista

30,654 Supermarkets employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 219 employers in Chula Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mississippi Market E7 Store 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirby Foods Tuscola 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Ayr - Main Store 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GIANT FOOD STORES 6065 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Management, Inc 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE farming 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. SAMBADO & SON INC 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agromillora California 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chula Vista Medical Center - 751 Medical Center Court 2,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharp Chula Vista Medical Ctr 2,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr Inc a UTC Aerospace Systems Company 1,957 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr, Inc. (Chula Vista CA) 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR Pebble Creek Golf Club 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Leaf Manor North 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ACR Home on 178th 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethany Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ashland Sawmill 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE SLE-ODFL 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #738 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kitsap Humane Society 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.