Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills

El Dorado Hills, CA · ~78 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills runs at 320% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills: 12.2 TCR = 320% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills safety composite

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills: 6.5 → 11.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 30.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills's TCR rose 5.3 from 6.5 in 2019 to 11.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 30.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · El Dorado Hills, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.2 · 320% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #437/635
  • PHOTO Ranch Estates of Tuc…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ranch Estates of Tucson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of El Dorado Hills averages 12.2 TCR (320% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills TCR series: 2019=6.5 · 2020=30.6 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=9.2 · 2023=7 · 2024=11.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of El Dorado Hills falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #437 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills (78 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of El Dorado Hills
Oakmont of El Dorado Hills (78 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of El Dorado Hills has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.8 10.3 8 0 0
2023 7.0 5.6 5 0 0
2022 9.2 1.5 6 0 0
2021 7.8 2.0 3 1 0
2020 30.6 23.5 3 10 0
2019 6.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · El Dorado Hills

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 37 employers in El Dorado Hills, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ranch Estates of Tucson 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Enclave of Scarborough 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillside Terrace of Hallowell, LLC 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Endive Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Napa 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Russell Harris Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hadley Date Gardens, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broadridge Customer Communications-EDH 790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broadridge Customer Communications 788 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roebbelen Contracting Inc 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3720_7100 308 FTE
NAT-TCR TXD036 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Pittsfield 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR R31 Roanoke VA 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dahlonega Hatchery 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kre-Bsl Husky Shrewsbury Operation LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arcosa Marine Products, Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of East Windsor - Department of Public Works 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohmstede Corpus 1263 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.