Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC

Santa Ana, CA · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC runs at 319% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC: 12.1 TCR = 319% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC safety composite

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2023→2024

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC injury rate improved

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC's TCR fell 3.2 from 13.8 in 2023 to 10.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=13.8 · 2024=10.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Santa Ana, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.1 · 319% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #436/635
  • PHOTO Oakmont of El Dorado…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of El Dorado Hills (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC averages 12.1 TCR (319% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC TCR series: 2023=13.8 · 2024=10.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #436 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC (48 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC
Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC (48 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Santa Ana MC Care Properties, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.5 10.5 3 1 0
2023 13.8 8.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Santa Ana

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 492 employers in Santa Ana, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of El Dorado Hills 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ranch Estates of Tucson 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bristal Assisted Living at Sayville 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Enclave of Scarborough 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ARVIN PRODUCTION & ADMIN 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rava Business Park 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guerrero Transportation & Contracting Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE VPS, Inc 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Think Together 2,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Santa Ana 1,472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orange County/Los Angeles 1,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR 056937-SANTA ANA CA P&DC 920 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 026 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Regal Shortstop Logistics 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogue Community Health - White City Clinic 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Auburn Wa 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Yeadon 10280 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tyler 10520 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fayetteville 10266 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newark 10213 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.