Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of Escondido Hills

Escondido, CA · ~89 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of Escondido Hills runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakmont of Escondido Hills: 9.3 TCR = 245% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of Escondido Hills safety composite

Oakmont of Escondido Hills scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.8

2017→2024

Oakmont of Escondido Hills injury rate improved

Oakmont of Escondido Hills's TCR fell 8.8 from 13.6 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.6 · 2018=11.2 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=15.8 · 2021=6.3 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Escondido, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 245% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #322/635
  • PHOTO Good Tree
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Good Tree (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of Escondido Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of Escondido Hills averages 9.3 TCR (245% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of Escondido Hills TCR series: 2017=13.6 · 2018=11.2 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=15.8 · 2021=6.3 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of Escondido Hills falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #322 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of Escondido Hills (89 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of Escondido Hills
Oakmont of Escondido Hills (89 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of Escondido Hills has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 1.2 4 0 0
2023 6.5 3.9 4 1 0
2021 6.3 6.3 4 0 0
2020 15.8 11.0 3 7 0
2019 6.9 5.5 5 0 0
2018 11.2 9.8 8 0 0
2017 13.6 12.3 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Escondido

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 244 employers in Escondido, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Good Tree 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63160 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Queen City 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Broccoli 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE GMI - CA 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ramona 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Booth Ranches LLC-BR1 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Escondido 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palomar Medical Center Escondido 3,031 FTE
CITY-NEAR Escondido CA 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bergelectric Corp. CA 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Lancs Industries 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trees, Shrubs & More 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McLaren Home Care and Hospice- North 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salford BBI Inc 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allegiant Air AUS 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE JPM INC dba Tri Phase Electric 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillcrest Healthcare, LLC 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loen Nursery, Inc. - Woodburn 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.