Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of Fresno

Fresno, CA · ~81 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of Fresno runs at 308% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakmont of Fresno: 11.7 TCR = 308% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of Fresno safety composite

Oakmont of Fresno scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oakmont of Fresno: 3.0 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 40.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2024

Oakmont of Fresno's TCR rose 5.5 from 3.0 in 2017 to 8.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 40.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 308% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #424/635
  • PHOTO Legacy Ridge at Alph…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Legacy Ridge at Alpharetta (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of Fresno in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of Fresno averages 11.7 TCR (308% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of Fresno TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=40.6 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of Fresno falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #424 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of Fresno (81 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of Fresno
Oakmont of Fresno (81 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of Fresno has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 4.2 6 0 0
2023 9.2 9.2 6 0 0
2022 7.6 4.6 2 3 0
2021 15.3 15.3 4 6 0
2020 40.6 40.6 1 18 0
2019 3.1 1.6 2 0 0
2018 6.2 4.7 4 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Fresno

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Legacy Ridge at Alpharetta 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warburton Place 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kelly Gardens 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63055 SUNRISE OF MERCER ISLAND 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Potato Inc. 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE STS Ranch LLC 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE C. R CRAIN AND SONS, INC 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miramar 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Hpc, L.L.C. 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Village Home Furnishings 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tasler, Inc. 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2273 - Bossier City 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE N.F. Mansuetto & Sons, Inc. 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE S07044 - Phoenix Hauling - White Tank 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monroe-Gregg School District 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.