Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Minnesota
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center
Minneapolis, MN · ~81 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 4.3
- Avg TCR
- 4.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade C.
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center: 4.3 TCR = 94% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center safety composite
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
67/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- C 4.25 per 100 workers
Safer than 66% of industry peers
- DART rate
- B 1.01 per 100 workers
Safer than 80% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−4.4
2017→2024
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center injury rate improved
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center's TCR fell 4.4 from 5.4 in 2017 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2017=5.4 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.9 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 485111 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL
Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 94% of ind
- DART 1.0 DART
- RANK #4/18
- PHOTO WESTERN PIEDMONT REG…
- BOOK 7y book
- INJ 20 inj
- SIZE ~81 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: WESTERN PIEDMONT REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center
4.3 TCR
- WESTERN PIEDMO
WESTERN PIEDMONT REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
4.3 TCR
- 1953-1003
1953-1003
4.3 TCR
- 55883 Sussex
55883 Sussex
4.2 TCR
- Mangrove
Mangrove
4.2 TCR
What this shows Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center averages 4.3 TCR (94% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center TCR series: 2017=5.4 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.9 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1 · BLS 4.5
Where Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center falls in its industry
421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishmentsSafer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Minnesota.
Metro Transit Operation Support Center/Instruction Center has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 10.9 | 9.1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
485111 · MN · Minneapolis
421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | WESTERN PIEDMONT REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY | 4.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | 55883 Sussex | 4.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Mangrove | 4.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | 1953-1003 | 4.3 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Rochester Breeder Farms | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | SJ Louis Construction, Inc. | 81 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Flynn Midwest - Minneapolis | 81 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | University of Minnesota Twin Cities | 22,522 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER | 12,021 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 0501 - City Center | 8,459 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Hennepin County Medical Center | 7,030 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Amick Farms, LLC SC Processing Plant | 4.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | EB Music Man | 4.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Craig Godwin Inc DBA United Machine Works | 4.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 019/University of the Cumberlands | 4.3 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Oakmont of Fresno | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | H. C. Olsen Construction Co., Inc. | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | N.F. Mansuetto & Sons, Inc. | 81 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | S07044 - Phoenix Hauling - White Tank | 81 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.