Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of Redding

Redding, CA · ~75 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of Redding runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakmont of Redding: 8.6 TCR = 226% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of Redding safety composite

Oakmont of Redding scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.8

2017→2024

Oakmont of Redding injury rate improved

Oakmont of Redding's TCR fell 16.8 from 22.5 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 22.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=22.5 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=13.2 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 226% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #273/635
  • PHOTO Spectrum Health Comp…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spectrum Health Companies McGregor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of Redding in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of Redding averages 8.6 TCR (226% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of Redding TCR series: 2017=22.5 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=13.2 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of Redding falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #273 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of Redding (75 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of Redding
Oakmont of Redding (75 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of Redding has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 5.7 4 0 0
2023 13.2 13.2 9 0 0
2022 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.2 7.2 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 15.5 12.4 9 1 0
2017 22.5 15.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Redding

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Health Companies McGregor 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parc at Sharon Amity 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Otay Ranch 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Seven Oaks 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunset Farms, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Managment, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTVIEW BERRY FARMS 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJRAS CORP DBA PRIME HARVEST CONTRACTING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR Town & Country Distributors, INC 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson-Merkey Contractors,Inc 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S04009 - WM of TN - Memphis 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Park East Landfill 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ernst Nursery & Farms 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia 032 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brimhall Elementary School 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGAS-A588 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.