Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of Roseville

Roseville, CA · ~73 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of Roseville runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Oakmont of Roseville: 6.0 TCR = 158% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of Roseville safety composite

Oakmont of Roseville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oakmont of Roseville: 3.2 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 13.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2024

Oakmont of Roseville's TCR rose 6.0 from 3.2 in 2017 to 9.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Roseville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 158% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #145/635
  • PHOTO 6273_14722
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6273_14722 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of Roseville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of Roseville averages 6.0 TCR (158% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of Roseville TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2018=13 · 2019=13.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of Roseville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of Roseville (73 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of Roseville
Oakmont of Roseville (73 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of Roseville has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 6.1 6 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 13.6 6.8 8 0 0
2018 13.0 11.3 8 0 0
2017 3.2 3.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Roseville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6273_14722 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Castle Gardens 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosemark at Mayfair Park Assisted Living 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens of Trent 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Columbia 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms Inc/Palomate Inc 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Tampa Lakes Health and Rehabilitation 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Calhoun County Isd 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MAIN 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Senior Community Services813000 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE H. Lamm Industries 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sam Rust Seafood, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE S09087 - Billerica MRF 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.