Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing · Texas

MAIN

Houston, TX · ~139 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MAIN runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

MAIN: 6.0 TCR = 182% of Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MAIN safety composite

MAIN scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2024

MAIN injury rate improved

MAIN's TCR fell 5.5 from 7.5 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2017=9.0 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=11.0 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 182% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO 23 North
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 74 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 23 North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

MAIN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MAIN averages 6.0 TCR (182% of the Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MAIN TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=9 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=11 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=7 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where MAIN falls in its industry

242 Filters, industrial and genera establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Filters, industrial and genera employers in Texas.

MAIN (139 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate MAIN
MAIN (139 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

MAIN has more employees than the Filters, industrial and general line (ex median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 3 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 4 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2021 7.0 6.2 9 0 0
2020 3.4 0.0 3 0 0
2019 11.0 8.9 16 0 0
2018 9.2 5.7 13 0 0
2017 9.0 4.2 13 0 0
2016 7.5 5.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · TX · Houston

242 Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 23 North 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centrifugal Services - Industrial Processing Equipment 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creative Design & Machine, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blastec, Inc. 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PAB 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland 6913 N FM 1788, Midland, TX 79707 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOSF-Lancaster 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE BENBROOK SV CTR 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Oakmont of Roseville 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa Lakes Health and Rehabilitation 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PBV-Winston Ops 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CIRSCO, Commercial Industrial Roof Services Company, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE S04022 - Detroit Central Hauling 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Classic Wire Cut Co Inc 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Konoike-Pacific California,Inc. 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Bodegon Grocery Inc 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.