Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights

Upland, CA · ~76 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights: 7.1 TCR = 186% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights safety composite

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights: 6.5 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.2× in 2024

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights's TCR rose 0.5 from 6.5 in 2017 to 7.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Upland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #200/635
  • PHOTO Rosecrans Villa, Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rosecrans Villa, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of San Antonio Heights averages 7.1 TCR (186% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights TCR series: 2017=6.5 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=12.8 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=7 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of San Antonio Heights falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #200 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights (76 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of San Antonio Heights
Oakmont of San Antonio Heights (76 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of San Antonio Heights has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 1.4 5 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 7.8 7.8 3 2 0
2019 12.8 9.6 8 0 0
2018 10.9 4.7 6 1 0
2017 6.5 3.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Upland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 80 employers in Upland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rosecrans Villa, Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF APEX 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Round Rock 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonata Villages I, LLC 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ADMINISTRATION 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3181_6797 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&J Labor,Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fujishige Farms, Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Antonio Regional Hospital 2,315 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Respite Care, Inc. 1,275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-036 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-007 908 FTE
NAT-TCR Canton Vehicle Assembly 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The BodyWorks 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 200 Hotel 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stamford EMS 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rich & Burns Utilities, LLC 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Elementary 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strouse 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE S07500 - Philadelphia MRF 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.