Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Brookdale Round Rock

Austin, TX · ~57 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Round Rock runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Round Rock: 7.1 TCR = 186% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Round Rock safety composite

Brookdale Round Rock scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.4

2016→2024

Brookdale Round Rock injury rate improved

Brookdale Round Rock's TCR fell 11.4 from 11.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.4 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=6.9 · 2020=14.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #261/470
  • PHOTO Oakmont of San Anton…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of San Antonio Heights (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Round Rock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Round Rock averages 7.1 TCR (186% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Round Rock TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=6.9 · 2020=14.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Round Rock falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #261 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Brookdale Round Rock (57 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Round Rock
Brookdale Round Rock (57 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Round Rock has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 14.7 12.6 7 0 0
2018 6.9 4.6 3 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2016 11.4 11.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Austin

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of San Antonio Heights 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosecrans Villa, Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF APEX 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonata Villages I, LLC 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Natural Resources Cedar Lake location 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKJ Transport - Energy Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR 08024-08-08-MARYSVILLE 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Otterbein New Albany 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North Ridge Home Health 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR EMS-Cannon Falls Senior LLC 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bronx Day School 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Plains Fairmont LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABC Construction Company Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Bend Ethanol, LLC 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.