Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of San Jose

San Jose, CA · ~67 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of San Jose runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakmont of San Jose: 7.7 TCR = 203% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of San Jose safety composite

Oakmont of San Jose scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2017→2024

Oakmont of San Jose injury rate improved

Oakmont of San Jose's TCR fell 2.1 from 7.1 in 2017 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.1 · 2019=17.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #226/635
  • PHOTO Garden Estates of Te…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Garden Estates of Temple (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of San Jose in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of San Jose averages 7.7 TCR (203% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of San Jose TCR series: 2017=7.1 · 2019=17.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of San Jose falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #226 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of San Jose (67 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of San Jose
Oakmont of San Jose (67 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of San Jose has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 3.3 3 0 0
2023 6.9 6.9 4 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 17.9 7.2 10 0 0
2017 7.1 3.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · San Jose

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Garden Estates of Temple 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Champions 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lebanon (TN), Elmcroft of 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Heritage at College View 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sonoma GVIC Ranches 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MUGU RANCH PARTNERSHIP 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Travaille and Phippen, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nurseries 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Shawano School District 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nasseff Mechanical Contractors, Inc 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus 087 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fergus Falls Workforce Center 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Murtco, Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITW Covid Security Group 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lomakatsi Restoration Project 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Free State Lumber Company, Inc. 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.