Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · Texas

Oates Industries, Inc.

La Porte, TX · ~96 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oates Industries, Inc. runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Oates Industries, Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 19% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oates Industries, Inc. safety composite

Oates Industries, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2020→2024

Oates Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

Oates Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.0 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · La Porte, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #64/92
  • PHOTO 32010 - INVISTA - OR…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 32010 - INVISTA - ORANGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Oates Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oates Industries, Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (19% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oates Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2020=1 · 2021=1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Oates Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 92 Industrial building (except wa employers in Texas.

Oates Industries, Inc. (96 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Oates Industries, Inc.
Oates Industries, Inc. (96 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Oates Industries, Inc. has more employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · TX · La Porte

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 170 employers in La Porte, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 32010 - INVISTA - ORANGE 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR J. WILLIAMS INDUSTRIAL GROUP, INC. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Urbana 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Service Company, LLC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3110 N I35 ROUND ROCK TX 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE TECO Central Plant 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layne Christensen - 1800 Hughes Landing Blvd 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial TX Corp 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold, Ltd. 2,821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold Specialty, Ltd. 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR TURN 2 Specialty Companies 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell Corp/Dacon Corp 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Honeywell International Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hegg Companies 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Boeing Distribution Services Inc. - Wichita, KS 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR LAX 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Haven Hall Healthcare Center 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building Products Inc. of SD 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klinger Constructors LLC. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE TATRO Plumbing Co. Inc. 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.