Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Delaney at Parkway Lakes

Richmond, TX · ~96 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Delaney at Parkway Lakes runs at 669% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Delaney at Parkway Lakes: 25.4 TCR = 669% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Delaney at Parkway Lakes safety composite

Delaney at Parkway Lakes scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−34.8

2023→2024

Delaney at Parkway Lakes injury rate improved

Delaney at Parkway Lakes's TCR fell 34.8 from 42.8 in 2023 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 42.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=42.8 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Richmond, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.4 · 669% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #466/470
  • PHOTO The Pines of Newmarket
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Pines of Newmarket (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Delaney at Parkway Lakes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Delaney at Parkway Lakes averages 25.4 TCR (669% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Delaney at Parkway Lakes TCR series: 2023=42.8 · 2024=8 · BLS 3.8

Where Delaney at Parkway Lakes falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #466 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Delaney at Parkway Lakes (96 employees, TCR 25.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Delaney at Parkway Lakes
Delaney at Parkway Lakes (96 employees, TCR 25.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Delaney at Parkway Lakes has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 2.3 7 0 0
2023 42.8 28.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Richmond

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 72 employers in Richmond, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Pines of Newmarket 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kensington Beatrice, LLC 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skylight Gardens Assisted Living 25.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairwinds Redmond 25.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3110 N I35 ROUND ROCK TX 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE TECO Central Plant 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oates Industries, Inc. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layne Christensen - 1800 Hughes Landing Blvd 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU6 2,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR OakBend Medical Center 1,038 FTE
CITY-NEAR OAkbend Medical Center-Jackson Street Hospital Campus 814 FTE
CITY-NEAR OakBend Medical Center- Williams Way Hospital Campus 676 FTE
NAT-TCR AB Spring Service, Inc. 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KBP Building Materials LLC dba Jenkins Lumber and Hardware 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 101 -West Los Angeles Animal Hospital 25.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0270 Shoreline 25.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gibbs Construction LLC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Gardens of Port St. Lucie 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 469 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barron 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.