Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living

Coos Bay, OR · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living: 5.8 TCR = 153% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living safety composite

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living: 2.4 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 16.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living's TCR rose 0.7 from 2.4 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Coos Bay, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 153% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #55/218
  • PHOTO Yancey House
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yancey House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ocean Ridge Assisted Living averages 5.8 TCR (153% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=16 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Ocean Ridge Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living (43 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ocean Ridge Assisted Living
Ocean Ridge Assisted Living (43 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Ocean Ridge Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2019 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2017 16.0 8.0 6 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Coos Bay

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 86 employers in Coos Bay, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yancey House 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-65010 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dunmore Plantation, LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartis Village at North Shore 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dahle Orchards LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creekside Valley Farms LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Slegers, Inc 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&B Reforestation, INC. 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1880 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1880 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coos Bay School District 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Bend Medical Center Coos Bay 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Holy Cross Hospital, INC 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5830 Charlotte SC 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 037662-Sco-Hopi Sta 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 179064-Vincennes Po 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mackenzie-Childs-ADC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steel T Heating and Air Conditioning Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Farmington Hills North 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cash Saver #572 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.