Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Yancey House

Burnsville, NC · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yancey House runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Yancey House: 5.8 TCR = 153% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yancey House safety composite

Yancey House scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.0

2016→2024

Yancey House injury rate improved

Yancey House's TCR fell 15.0 from 15.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.0 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Burnsville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 153% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #173/356
  • PHOTO Ocean Ridge Assisted…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ocean Ridge Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Yancey House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yancey House averages 5.8 TCR (153% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yancey House TCR series: 2016=15 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Yancey House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #173 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Yancey House (46 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Yancey House
Yancey House (46 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Yancey House has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.5 0.0 3 0 0
2020 8.1 2.7 3 0 0
2019 10.5 2.6 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.5 5.7 3 0 0
2016 15.0 15.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Burnsville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 15 employers in Burnsville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ocean Ridge Assisted Living 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-65010 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dunmore Plantation, LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartis Village at North Shore 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harrells Facility 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buck Steam Station 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE KITTY HAWK AREA 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burnsville 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glen Raven Custom Fabrics - Burnsville Plant 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glen Raven Custom Fabrics, Burnsville, NC 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burnsville Plant 184 FTE
NAT-TCR McHenry, IL - Pallet Plant - 337 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR OG Thunderbird 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Siena Lakes 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dutchland Foods 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eclipse Awning System 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACS Kansas City 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bunim-Murray Productions, LLC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 400-DREES-CLEVELAND 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.