Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) · California

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco

San Francisco, CA · ~1,720 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) workplace, earning a grade C.

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco: 3.3 TCR = 102% of Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco safety composite

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2018

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco injury rate improved

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.5 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2018=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 102% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #6/97
  • PHOTO Police Department & …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~1,720 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Police Department & Animal Control (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Office of Field Operations - San Francisco averages 3.3 TCR (102% of the Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2018=3 · BLS 3.2

Where Office of Field Operations - San Francisco falls in its industry

716 Police departments (except Ame establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 97 Police departments (except Ame employers in California.

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco (1,720 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Office of Field Operations - San Francisco
Office of Field Operations - San Francisco (1,720 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Office of Field Operations - San Francisco has more employees than the Police departments (except American Indi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.0 1.0 56 0 0
2016 3.5 1.1 53 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · CA · San Francisco

716 Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Police Department & Animal Control 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Boonton Police 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Police 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montana Board of Crime Control 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3840 - UDC-Rialto 1,722 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCHI1 MILLER CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 1,722 FTE
STATE-SIZE AX9 Security Inc 1,725 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAS CO TOWER - 15 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0619 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BHCHP BMH 780 Albany 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Redi-Mix, LLC Kennedale 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jay R. Smith Mfg. Co. 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE FCI Sheridan 1,720 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bon Secours Memorial Regional Medical 1,719 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Memorial Hospital- Desoto 1,719 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHRISTUS Spohn Shoreline 1,718 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.