Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) · District of Columbia

Office of Human Resources Management

Washington, DC · ~563 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Office of Human Resources Management runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) workplace, earning a grade A.

Office of Human Resources Management: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Office of Human Resources Management safety composite

Office of Human Resources Management scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2018

Office of Human Resources Management injury rate improved

Office of Human Resources Management's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2018=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK P98
  • PHOTO CPD-Chicago Public S…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~563 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CPD-Chicago Public Safety Headquarters | 3510 S. Michigan Ave. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Office of Human Resources Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Office of Human Resources Management averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Office of Human Resources Management TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2018=0.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Office of Human Resources Management falls in its industry

716 Police departments (except Ame establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Office of Human Resources Management (563 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Office of Human Resources Management
Office of Human Resources Management (563 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Office of Human Resources Management has more employees than the Police departments (except American Indi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.8 0.5 5 0 0
2016 2.1 0.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · DC · Washington

716 Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CPD-Chicago Public Safety Headquarters | 3510 S. Michigan Ave. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR VPD Headquarters 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCSO Orosi Sub-Station 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCSD Crime Lab / Sheriff Coroner 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Omni Shoreham Hotel 553 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3000 BLADENSBURG FACILITY 548 FTE
STATE-SIZE NATS GENERAL CONCESS 580 FTE
STATE-SIZE 105001-CURSEEN-MORRIS DC P&DC 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Harrisburg Branch 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AC Home Depot US 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Lab 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Construction 563 FTE
NAT-SIZE R.H. White Companies 563 FTE
NAT-SIZE CECO Concrete : Miami 563 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willow Valley Lakes Manor 563 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.